In this article, we compare the cost of Athena EMR software with eClinicalWorks’, and look at how their features stack up. We will also discuss the cost of training, maintenance, and updates. Purchasing either software is an investment in your practice, and we hope this article has provided you with some useful information. The cost of using an EHR will depend on the level of usage and how much time you want to spend learning and training the software.
Athenahealth
The Athena EMR offers a comprehensive, cloud-based electronic medical record that reduces administrative tasks. The EHR uses an easily updated database that stores information securely and allows physicians to update patient information anytime. The EHR also helps to streamline documentation and allows physicians to select who can access it and view patient information. While Athena health is better suited for hospitals and smaller practices, eClinicalWorks offers a more a la carte suite that allows doctors to choose what is best for their practice.
Cloud Based Clinical Solution
Athena is a cloud-based clinical solution that combines software services to eliminate administrative and clinical burdens. It streamlines physician workflows and incorporates patient engagement tools. Its user sentiment is 76 in Athena, while eClinicalWorks has an average rating of 68 in user reviews. The user experience for both systems is similar, with some users saying that Athena is easier to use and more intuitive than eClinicalWorks.
Athenahealth EMR focuses on the clinical control of practice and helps improve the efficiency of the entire company. eClinicalWorks, on the other hand, focuses on automating routine tasks, while Athena health focuses on the patient’s experience and the efficiency of the practice. Unlike eClinicalWorks, Athenahealth has a simplified interface and is easier to use than eClinicalWorks.
Market Leader
Athenahealth is a market leader in the EMR market, and its software is capable of handling the needs of more than a million physicians and other healthcare professionals globally. Its innovative features enable doctors to streamline their workflow and eliminate the need for handwritten documentation. This technology helps physicians increase revenue and improve the quality of care for patients. This software can help physicians streamline their business processes and provide the most up-to-date information.
eClinicalWorks is more expensive than eClinicalWorks, but the cost of Athena health is lower than the average EMR software. AdvancedMD also offers medical billing, e-prescriptions, and appointment scheduling. AdvancedMD’s price tag is quite high, but it’s still one of the best EHR systems. The only major disadvantage of AdvancedMD EMR is that it doesn’t offer a free trial.
Athenahealth is a privately-owned EMR Software company with a proven track record of improving workflows and care efficiency. Its technology is used by more than 80,000 physicians and 472,000 healthcare practitioners in the US. In addition to these large numbers, eClinicalWorks also has a strong revenue stream, with over $250 million in annual sales. It also offers specialized data centers, ensuring high availability and high speed.
eClinicalWorks
Both Athena EMR and eClinicalWorks EMR offer similar features and functionality but are priced differently. When considering these two Medical Practice Management (MPM) solutions, the first thing to consider is their price. Currently, both athenaOne and eClinicalWorks are priced at $499 per month. However, if you want to save money, you can purchase a plan with lower prices.
AthenaOne features include medical billing, patient engagement, and EHR. However, eClinicalWorks EHR Software is more customizable for healthcare practices. Its industry-specific functionalities ensure increased ROI and efficiency. AthenaOne may have hidden costs, which you should be aware of. To find out if you should use one of these systems, read our comparison article.
A major difference between the two products is the level of customer support and service. Athenahealth consistently outperforms eClinicalWorks, and its customer success is largely attributable to its dedicated account managers. In contrast, eClinicalWorks’ support team may be harder to scale, with long response times and unanswered tickets. So In addition, users report that eClinicalWorks support is a problem that makes them reluctant to use the platform.
In addition to its flexibility and customizability, eClinicalWorks also offers innovative solutions to streamline workflows and promote improved patient outcomes. Furthermore, it facilitates clinical processes through endless mobile compatibility and drag-and-drop capability. This makes eClinicalWorks the better choice for smaller practices with basic EMR needs. It is difficult to compare eClinicalWorks Vs. eClinicalWorks for healthcare practices that have limited EHR needs.
EPIC Care EMR
Epic Care EMR has a solid client base, and reviews cite impressive features, such as its intuitive dashboard. It helps physicians develop effective treatment plans. It is customizable and flexible, and the eClinicalWorks features add value to the clinical reputation. Both companies offer free demos. It is important to compare these two options to make a decision based on quality. So, if you are comparing both products, the best way to decide is to use a comparison guide.
Cerner
If you’re comparing a physician EMR, you’ll want to consider the user interface of each program. Both Cerner and AthenaHealth offer a well-designed graphical user interface, but that doesn’t always translate into ease of use. Some users report that the software is cumbersome and tedious, and there’s little intuitiveness involved in using the platform. Still, Athena Health is a usable EHR, and if you don’t mind spending some time training users on it, Cerner isn’t so bad.
Customer Support
Both software products offer specialized support for their users. Cerner customers can reach its customer support representatives 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Athenahealth customers can only access support during normal business hours. Authentic customer reviews are available at EMRSystems.com, but it’s better to opt for the former. In addition, both EMR solutions have an intuitive user interface and are compatible with many different software packages.
Robust Integration
Both Athena and Cerner have robust integration capabilities. AthenaHealth provides pre-built integrations with third-party software. Cerner is equally committed to integration, having built three platforms to integrate clinical data with other applications. Additionally, it has APIs and application program interfaces (APIs) for integration with third-party software. A demo session can help you compare the software and make a more informed decision.
Serverless Capabilities
Athena offers serverless capabilities, which make it easier for doctors and other users to implement. Its pricing starts at $25 per user per month. It is best for users who need to maintain a large data warehouse. The Athena service can also handle large data warehouses. Athena Health offers cloud-based features, including a web-based interface. And Athena’s cost structure is unique. Its features include inpatient and outpatient integration.
Ease of Use
Cerner’s ease of use is one of its biggest advantages, but users have critics. Both companies have cult-like followings among Epic users. Users of both software are highly motivated and passionate about their products, and they have a track record of developing products that cover every aspect of healthcare. But there are pros and cons to both systems. Let’s take a look at the features of each and decide for yourself!
Acer has a strong presence in the market. Its Millennium offering was launched in 1997. It continues to evolve and gains market share around the globe. Its customer base largely values its ability to scale to smaller facilities. Cerner has taken issue with the KLAS report, saying that it captures only a limited view of the company’s U.S. business. Despite this, it remains the top player in health care technology.
Final Verdict
For smaller medical practices, Cerner’s Ambulatory EHR is a good choice. Its patient portal makes managing patient records easy and intuitive while meeting HIPAA requirements. Users can view patient records online, make appointments, and search for evidence-based research. It also features a user-friendly dashboard and secure access via mobile devices. The Athena EMR is also ONC-ATCB-approved and meets Meaningful Use Stages 1 and 2.
