The P/E ratio measures how cheaply valued a company’s stock price is by dividing the current stock price to its earnings-per-share (EPS). It indicates the dollar amount an investor can expect to invest in a company to receive $1 of that company’s earnings. Kimberly-Clark P/E ratio is 26.33. it has decreased in comparison to the same period last year. this metric is one of the most popular because it easily summarizes the status of the company. however, in order to make an informed decision, more metrics should be analysed. Let’s dive into Kimberly-Clark’s P/E ratio
What is Kimberly-Clark P/E Ratio?
The P/E ratio of Kimberly-Clark is 26.33, which represents a 5.59% decrease from the same period last year. their average P/E ratio is 26.31 and their 5-year average is 25.83.
What is Kimberly-Clark Net EPS?
Kimberly-Clark’s net earnings for the most recent quarter was $5,2 million, which represents a 11.86% decrease over the same period last year.
Who are Kimberly-Clark Competitors?
Based on Jika.io AI model, Reckitt Benckiser Group, Copa Holdings, S.A., Godrej Consumer Products, Henkel AG & Co. KGaA, Jyothy Labs, Marico, The Procter & Gamble, Unilever are considered to be Kimberly-Clark’s competitors because the companies operate in the same industry as Kimberly-Clark and they are targeting the same customer base. in addition, competitors typically share a similar market capitalization as Kimberly-Clark.
Who is Kimberly-Clark’s Biggest competitor?
The biggest competitor of Kimberly-Clark is Reckitt Benckiser Group based on the Jika.io AI model. it has a similar market capitalization to Kimberly-Clark in the industry, it dominates a similar share of the market as Kimberly-Clark, and it provides and markets very similar services.
What industry is Kimberly-Clark in?
Kimberly-Clark is part of the Household & Personal Products industry and the Consumer Defensive sector.
Kimberly-Clark vs Reckitt Benckiser Group
Market Cap: Kimberly-Clark’s Market Cap of 46152122368 is lower than Reckitt Benckiser Group Market Cap of 51365580800.
Average Volume: Kimberly-Clark’s Average Volume of 1.941M is lower than Reckitt Benckiser Group Average Volume of 7861.0.
Beta: Kimberly-Clark’s Beta of 0.38 is higher than Reckitt Benckiser Group Beta of 0.08.
Revenue: Kimberly-Clark’s Revenue of 19.44B is higher than Reckitt Benckiser Group Revenue of 13.234B.
Net Income: Kimberly-Clark’s Net Income of 1.814B is higher than Reckitt Benckiser Group Net Income of -32.0M.
Gross Profit: Kimberly-Clark’s Gross Profit of 5.988B is lower than Reckitt Benckiser Group Gross Profit of 7.676B.
Ebitda: Kimberly-Clark’s Ebitda of 3.315B is lower than Reckitt Benckiser Group Ebitda of 485.0M.
P/E Ratio: Kimberly-Clark’s P/E Ratio of 26.44 is lower than Reckitt Benckiser Group P/E Ratio of 29.87.
P/S Ratio: Kimberly-Clark’s P/S Ratio of 2.33 is lower than Reckitt Benckiser Group P/S Ratio of 5.5.
P/B Ratio: Kimberly-Clark’s P/B Ratio of 65.48 is lower than Reckitt Benckiser Group P/B Ratio of 7.05.
P/FCF Ratio: Kimberly-Clark’s P/FCF Ratio of 27.96 is lower than Reckitt Benckiser Group P/FCF Ratio of 34.0.
ROE: Kimberly-Clark’s ROE of 3.16 is higher than Reckitt Benckiser Group ROE of 0.21.
ROA: Kimberly-Clark’s ROA of 0.09 is higher than Reckitt Benckiser Group ROA of 0.06.
Return On Capital Employed: Kimberly-Clark’s Return On Capital Employed of 0.22 is higher than Reckitt Benckiser Group Return On Capital Employed of 0.13.
Gross Profit Margin: Kimberly-Clark’s Gross Profit Margin of 0.3 is lower than Reckitt Benckiser Group Gross Profit Margin of 0.6.
Assets (Total): Kimberly-Clark’s Assets (Total) of 17.837B is lower than Reckitt Benckiser Group Assets (Total) of 26.946B.
Debt (Total): Kimberly-Clark’s Debt (Total) of 8.704B is lower than Reckitt Benckiser Group Debt (Total) of 9.563B.
Kimberly-Clark vs Copa Holdings, S.A.
Market Cap: Kimberly-Clark’s Market Cap of 46152122368 is higher than Copa Holdings, S.A. Market Cap of 2610102272.
Average Volume: Kimberly-Clark’s Average Volume of 1.941M is lower than Copa Holdings, S.A. Average Volume of 489708.0.
Beta: Kimberly-Clark’s Beta of 0.38 is lower than Copa Holdings, S.A. Beta of 1.42.
Revenue: Kimberly-Clark’s Revenue of 19.44B is higher than Copa Holdings, S.A. Revenue of 1.51B.
Net Income: Kimberly-Clark’s Net Income of 1.814B is lower than Copa Holdings, S.A. Net Income of 39.945M.
Gross Profit: Kimberly-Clark’s Gross Profit of 5.988B is lower than Copa Holdings, S.A. Gross Profit of 550.059M.
Ebitda: Kimberly-Clark’s Ebitda of 3.315B is higher than Copa Holdings, S.A. Ebitda of 124.261M.
P/E Ratio: Kimberly-Clark’s P/E Ratio of 26.44 is higher than Copa Holdings, S.A. P/E Ratio of 15.85.
P/S Ratio: Kimberly-Clark’s P/S Ratio of 2.33 is higher than Copa Holdings, S.A. P/S Ratio of 1.39.
P/B Ratio: Kimberly-Clark’s P/B Ratio of 65.48 is higher than Copa Holdings, S.A. P/B Ratio of 2.04.
P/FCF Ratio: Kimberly-Clark’s P/FCF Ratio of 27.96 is lower than Copa Holdings, S.A. P/FCF Ratio of 4.17.
ROE: Kimberly-Clark’s ROE of 3.16 is higher than Copa Holdings, S.A. ROE of 0.14.
ROA: Kimberly-Clark’s ROA of 0.09 is higher than Copa Holdings, S.A. ROA of 0.04.
Return On Capital Employed: Kimberly-Clark’s Return On Capital Employed of 0.22 is higher than Copa Holdings, S.A. Return On Capital Employed of 0.08.
Gross Profit Margin: Kimberly-Clark’s Gross Profit Margin of 0.3 is lower than Copa Holdings, S.A. Gross Profit Margin of 0.39.
Assets (Total): Kimberly-Clark’s Assets (Total) of 17.837B is lower than Copa Holdings, S.A. Assets (Total) of 4.248B.
Debt (Total): Kimberly-Clark’s Debt (Total) of 8.704B is higher than Copa Holdings, S.A. Debt (Total) of 1.604B.
Kimberly-Clark vs Godrej Consumer Products
Market Cap: Kimberly-Clark’s Market Cap of 46152122368 is lower than Godrej Consumer Products Market Cap of 780435456000.
Average Volume: Kimberly-Clark’s Average Volume of 1.941M is higher than Godrej Consumer Products Average Volume of 1.667M.
Beta: Kimberly-Clark’s Beta of 0.38 is higher than Godrej Consumer Products Beta of 0.22.
Revenue: Kimberly-Clark’s Revenue of 19.44B is higher than Godrej Consumer Products Revenue of 122.765B.
Net Income: Kimberly-Clark’s Net Income of 1.814B is lower than Godrej Consumer Products Net Income of 17.834B.
Gross Profit: Kimberly-Clark’s Gross Profit of 5.988B is lower than Godrej Consumer Products Gross Profit of 62.014B.
Ebitda: Kimberly-Clark’s Ebitda of 3.315B is higher than Godrej Consumer Products Ebitda of 24.753B.
P/E Ratio: Kimberly-Clark’s P/E Ratio of 26.44 is lower than Godrej Consumer Products P/E Ratio of 43.0.
P/S Ratio: Kimberly-Clark’s P/S Ratio of 2.33 is lower than Godrej Consumer Products P/S Ratio of 6.22.
P/B Ratio: Kimberly-Clark’s P/B Ratio of 65.48 is higher than Godrej Consumer Products P/B Ratio of 6.64.
P/FCF Ratio: Kimberly-Clark’s P/FCF Ratio of 27.96 is lower than Godrej Consumer Products P/FCF Ratio of 53.4.
ROE: Kimberly-Clark’s ROE of 3.16 is higher than Godrej Consumer Products ROE of 0.18.
ROA: Kimberly-Clark’s ROA of 0.09 is lower than Godrej Consumer Products ROA of 0.11.
Return On Capital Employed: Kimberly-Clark’s Return On Capital Employed of 0.22 is higher than Godrej Consumer Products Return On Capital Employed of 0.19.
Gross Profit Margin: Kimberly-Clark’s Gross Profit Margin of 0.3 is lower than Godrej Consumer Products Gross Profit Margin of 0.51.
Assets (Total): Kimberly-Clark’s Assets (Total) of 17.837B is higher than Godrej Consumer Products Assets (Total) of 161.341B.
Debt (Total): Kimberly-Clark’s Debt (Total) of 8.704B is higher than Godrej Consumer Products Debt (Total) of 17.043B.
Kimberly-Clark vs Henkel AG & Co. KGaA
Market Cap: Kimberly-Clark’s Market Cap of 46152122368 is higher than Henkel AG & Co. KGaA Market Cap of 25577973760.
Average Volume: Kimberly-Clark’s Average Volume of 1.941M is lower than Henkel AG & Co. KGaA Average Volume of 134479.0.
Beta: Kimberly-Clark’s Beta of 0.38 is lower than Henkel AG & Co. KGaA Beta of 0.57.
Revenue: Kimberly-Clark’s Revenue of 19.44B is lower than Henkel AG & Co. KGaA Revenue of 20.066B.
Net Income: Kimberly-Clark’s Net Income of 1.814B is higher than Henkel AG & Co. KGaA Net Income of 1.634B.
Gross Profit: Kimberly-Clark’s Gross Profit of 5.988B is lower than Henkel AG & Co. KGaA Gross Profit of 8.974B.
Ebitda: Kimberly-Clark’s Ebitda of 3.315B is higher than Henkel AG & Co. KGaA Ebitda of 3.184B.
P/E Ratio: Kimberly-Clark’s P/E Ratio of 26.44 is higher than Henkel AG & Co. KGaA P/E Ratio of 15.52.
P/S Ratio: Kimberly-Clark’s P/S Ratio of 2.33 is higher than Henkel AG & Co. KGaA P/S Ratio of 1.26.
P/B Ratio: Kimberly-Clark’s P/B Ratio of 65.48 is higher than Henkel AG & Co. KGaA P/B Ratio of 1.29.
P/FCF Ratio: Kimberly-Clark’s P/FCF Ratio of 27.96 is lower than Henkel AG & Co. KGaA P/FCF Ratio of 9.89.
ROE: Kimberly-Clark’s ROE of 3.16 is higher than Henkel AG & Co. KGaA ROE of 0.11.
ROA: Kimberly-Clark’s ROA of 0.09 is higher than Henkel AG & Co. KGaA ROA of 0.06.
Return On Capital Employed: Kimberly-Clark’s Return On Capital Employed of 0.22 is higher than Henkel AG & Co. KGaA Return On Capital Employed of 0.12.
Gross Profit Margin: Kimberly-Clark’s Gross Profit Margin of 0.3 is lower than Henkel AG & Co. KGaA Gross Profit Margin of 0.46.
About Kimberly-Clark
Kimberly-Clark Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, manufactures and markets personal care and consumer tissue products worldwide. it operates in three segments: Personal Care, Consumer Tissue and K-C Professional. the Personal Care segment offers disposable diapers, swimsuits, training and youth pants, baby wipes, feminine and incontinence care products and other related products under the brands Huggies, Pull-Ups, Little Swimmers, GoodNites, DryNites, Sweety, Kotex, U by Kotex, Intimus, Depend, Plenitud, Softex, Poise and other brand names. the Consumer Tissue segment provides facial and bathroom tissues, paper towels, napkins and related products under Kleenex, Scott, Cottonelle, Viva, Andrex, Scottex, Neve and other brand names. the K-C Professional segment offers wipers, tissues, towels, apparel, soaps and sanitizers under the Kleenex, Scott, WypAll, Kimtech and KleenGuard brands. the company sells household products directly to supermarkets, mass merchandisers, drugstores, warehouse clubs, variety and department stores and other retail outlets, as well as through other distributors and e-commerce; and products for use outside the home, directly to manufacturing, lodging, office buildings, food service and public facilities, as well as through distributors and e-commerce. Kimberly-Clark Corporation was founded in 1872 and is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.
